Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Cromwell Enage (sponage_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-13 14:01:37

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Defining compilers suggestion"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Reference to SF tracker is important"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [parameter] ArgumentPack + macros"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [parameter] ArgumentPack + macros"

Whatever the final name of the concept is, shouldn't
the template parameter type used by
BOOST_PARAMETER_FUN and BOOST_PARAMETER_MEMFUN be
called by this name?

Cromwell D. Enage

____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Defining compilers suggestion"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Reference to SF tracker is important"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [parameter] ArgumentPack + macros"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [parameter] ArgumentPack + macros"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk