Re: [boost] Reference to SF tracker is important

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-13 15:17:42

Phil Richards <news_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On 2005-07-13, Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>  David Abrahams wrote:
>> > "John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> >>Is it possible to insist that all posts to the tracker are from folks who 
>> >>are logged on?  The gcc bug tracker does that and it works very well IMO.
>> > I don't think we can do that with the SF tracker, but there are better
>> > systems.  For example, we could use BugZilla (same as the GCC tracker)
>> > ;-)
>>  Of course "better" is a matter of debate... For example I would not 
>>  consider BugZilla better than SF tracker, more functional maybe. But I 
>>  would consider MantisBT better than both.
>
> And having used BugZilla and MantisBT I would be inclined to agree.
> And from a configuration point of view, MantisBT is *trivial*.

What, still no debate?! ;-)

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com