|
Boost : |
From: Pavol Droba (droba_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-14 08:14:47
Hi John,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:32:15PM +0100, John Maddock wrote:
[snip]
> At present I can't think of any real world use cases where a trailing empty
> field would be important, so here's the challenge: can anyone think of a
> file format, or transmission format or command line syntax or whatever where
> the trailing field is actually required? Real world cases only please, but
> first two data points:
>
> CSV files, and the Unicode character database don't require the output of
> trailing blanks (and parsing of the latter would certainly break if they
> were considered).
>
I have one case where it is natural to have: CSV file with a tabular data in it.
When you parsing this structure, it is natural to have trailing blank, since
it represents a valid data point.
Another example is file path parsing. There is a fundamental difference between
/folder1/folder2/file
and
/folder1/folder2/folder3/
Yet after spliting (and not considering the last blank) this difference is lost.
Sure, it can almoust always be workarouded. But I assume, that it is much easier
to skip a blank token, than check always if it was supposed to be there.
Regards,
Pavol.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk