Re: [boost] New Library Proposal: dual_state

From: Jost, Andrew (Andrew_Jost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-15 09:39:56

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Joel de Guzman
> Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:41 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] New Library Proposal: dual_state
> 
> Jost, Andrew wrote:
> >  
> >>Hmmm.  This reminds me of using the STL algorithms before having 
> >>Boost.Lambda, Boost.Bind, etc.  Without a library of predefined 
> >>function objects that perform useful, reusable adaptations, or a 
> >>lambda approach to creating the adapters, one winds up 
> separating the 
> >>value extraction logic from the context in which it is used.
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > The Boost.Optional::adapter syntax is its own predefined 
> library and,
> > though lambda is a fantastic approach, it won't compile 
> using Microsoft
> > so we can't say it's the new paradigm.
> 
> lambda works on Microsoft VC7.1 and above. Did I miss the
> context of your statement?
>

Sorry, you are right.  I am using VC 6.0 :-(

> Cheers,
> -- 
> Joel de Guzman
> http://www.boost-consulting.com
> http://spirit.sf.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>