Re: [boost] [config] Why is BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG definedinsuffix.hpp?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-19 07:31:40

> As I recall there were issues with lack of i/o support in some 2.92 
> versions
> of gcc as well -- but in any case date-time will benefit from this change 
> b/c
> it depends on i/o for int64 and uint64.

Perhaps I wasn't being clear: the proposed change fixes one test file only, 
it doesn't make those operators globally available - although that might not 
be a bad idea if we can figure out how to do that in a reasonably portable 
manner - but a global change like that (or a new config macro) really would 
have to wait until after 1.33.

John.