Re: [boost] [private] Re: Macros at namespace scope: trailing semicolon?

From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-19 15:11:28

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rob Stewart

> > I don't think there's a misunderstanding that the macro is doing a 
> > token substitution, but I think that many people view them 
> as "doing 
> > the same thing for all intensive purposes".  This merging between 
> > different types of work is
> 
> In case you care, s/intensive/intents and/.  I saw you write 
> this a couple of times and thought it might be a real 
> misunderstanding rather than a late 
> night/tired/frustrated/whatever mistake.

I meant "for all intents and purposes".  Thanks for pointing it out, it didn't
seem right when I wrote it, but I was in a hurry, and it was about 3:00 AM.

Regards,
Paul Mensonides