Re: [boost] Question about shared_prt doc's

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-22 18:42:21

Joe Gottman wrote:
>   In the documentation for the shared_ptr constructor that takes a
> weak_ptr parameter, it says that if the weak_ptr is empty then so is
> the constructed shared_ptr.  But it also says that if the weak_ptr
> has a use_count() of 0 then a bad_weak_ptr exception is thrown. Since an 
> empty weak_ptr has a use_count() of 0, these statements
> can't both be true.  Which one is?

The latter. Thank you for reviewing the documentation and pointing these 
out!