|
Boost : |
From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-28 08:06:07
On Jul 28, 2005, at 3:32 AM, Martin Wille wrote:
> Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>> Is there a reason why Intel C++ 9.0, being the latest released version
>> of that compiler, is not on the list of the required toolsets?
>
> AFAICS, Intel C++ 9 was released after the required toolsets were
> defined. There isn't a free Intel C++ 9 version for Linux, yet (it's
> scheduled for August, according to Intel).
Yep. Just like Apple's GCC 4.0 for Tiger, it came too late in the cycle
to introduce without pushing the release back.
Doug
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk