Re: [boost] Interest for a perl6-like-junctions-class?

From: Darren Cook (darren_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-01 20:46:28

>>>  namespace: boost::multivalues
>>>  base class: multivalue
>>>  all_of: all_values
>>>  any_of: any_value
>>>  none_of: no_values
>>>  one_of: one_value
> I'm hoping someone else will jump in soon enough with other
> suggestions since the release furor is mostly past now.

I thought this naming was okay. Also "junctions" is acceptable, if they
behave similarly enough to the perl implementation.

>>junctions (multivalues) are trivial, but i must admit they aren't.
> 
> Indeed.

Yes, I've been following the thread and the non-obvious things you've
come across is interesting. I've had nothing useful to add yet. I think
when in doubt doing the same as the perl implementation may be best.

Darren