|
Boost : |
From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-03 11:27:20
From: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
> "Pavel Vozenilek" <pavel_vozenilek_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> Anyway, saying that symmetry requires
>
> none_of(a) == any_of(b)
>
> to be equivalent to
>
> any_of(a) == none_of(b)
>
> is about as valid as saying
>
> 3*x == 1+y
>
> must be equivalent to
>
> 1+x == 3*y
>
> It makes no sense to me.
I was doing that, wasn't I? It is nonsensical. Thanks for
clarifying my blunder.
-- Rob Stewart stewart_at_[hidden] Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk