Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-05 13:50:27

Rob Stewart <stewart_at_[hidden]> writes:

> From: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> Rob Stewart <stewart_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > all_of(a)(frobnicates, any_of(b))
>> >
>> I started there, but the placement of parens seems to arbitrary and
>> unbalanced. Also, the whole point of infix is to get rid of those.
> So you think this is better?
>> >> all_of(a)._,frobnicates, any_of(b)

Yes, but not as nice visually as

  all_of(a)._ <frobnicates> any_of(b)

> Is the _ member needed?

It is if you're going to support

   all_of(a) , all_of(b)

just the same way as you'd support

   all_of(a) > all_of(b)

If you give up support for the comma operator, you can use it for this

> What about this:
> all_of(a)@frobnicates_at_any_of(b)
> That only needs, using the type names from my library,

Needs what? A new language that supports the @ character?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at