From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-05 13:50:27
Rob Stewart <stewart_at_[hidden]> writes:
> From: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
>> Rob Stewart <stewart_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > all_of(a)(frobnicates, any_of(b))
>> I started there, but the placement of parens seems to arbitrary and
>> unbalanced. Also, the whole point of infix is to get rid of those.
> So you think this is better?
>> >> all_of(a)._,frobnicates, any_of(b)
Yes, but not as nice visually as
all_of(a)._ <frobnicates> any_of(b)
> Is the _ member needed?
It is if you're going to support
all_of(a) , all_of(b)
just the same way as you'd support
all_of(a) > all_of(b)
If you give up support for the comma operator, you can use it for this
> What about this:
> That only needs, using the type names from my library,
Needs what? A new language that supports the @ character?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk