|
Boost : |
From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-11 10:52:59
Markus Sch?pflin wrote:
> Bart wrote:
>
> > Yes, it is a typo. It should be an ampersand instead of an asterisk.
> >
> > date_generator_parser(const date_generator_parser<date_type,charT>& dgp)
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------^
> >
> > Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
>
> It's present in the current RC as well.
Presumably it doesn't matter much, since the compiler will generate a
copy ctor with the right semantics, so the typo just introduces a
constructor that will only cause an error if it's instantiated, which is
fairly unlikely.
In fact, why is the copy ctor explicitly defined at all?
jon
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk