From: Beth Jacobson (bethj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-12 01:02:44
Jeff Garland wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:57:56 -0400, Beth Jacobson wrote
>>they serve no real purpose and are
>>non-standard, so if some people are finding them confusing or even
>>just annoying, that's probably sufficient reason to take them out. I
>>won't change the test page because they don't really interfere with
>>people's ability to evaluate the rest of the changes, but at this
>>point I'm thinking they probably don't belong in the final version.
> I think the new color scheme is the best I've seen -- I'd ship it. We should
> leave the underlines -- I agree with the comment that the color by itself is
> too subtle. I could go either way on the disappering behavior. The nice
> part is that it gives feedback that you are over the link. But no big deal
> either way.
> Thx Beth for jumping in with some fresh ideas -- and of course thx to Rene for
> all the prior work...
Thanks Jeff. I should have been clearer before. It's the "disappearings"
I'm having doubts about. I agree the underlining is important for clarity.
Thanks too, to everyone for their feedback. It really helped to have so
many different eyes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk