Re: [boost] New boost webpage

From: Beth Jacobson (bethj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-12 01:02:44

Jeff Garland wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:57:56 -0400, Beth Jacobson wrote
> 
>>they serve no real purpose and are 
>>non-standard, so if some people are finding them confusing or even 
>>just annoying, that's probably sufficient reason to take them out. I 
>>won't change the test page because they don't really interfere with 
>>people's ability to evaluate the rest of the changes, but at this 
>>point I'm thinking they probably don't belong in the final version.
> 
> 
> I think the new color scheme is the best I've seen -- I'd ship it.  We should
> leave the underlines -- I agree with the comment that the color by itself is
> too subtle.    I could go either way on the disappering behavior.  The nice
> part is that it gives feedback that you are over the link.  But no big deal
> either way.
> 
> Thx Beth for jumping in with some fresh ideas -- and of course thx to Rene for
>  all the prior work...

Thanks Jeff. I should have been clearer before. It's the "disappearings" 
I'm having doubts about. I agree the underlining is important for clarity.

Thanks too, to everyone for their feedback. It really helped to have so 
many different eyes.