From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-12 07:09:37
The "official" Redhat/Fedora rpms for boost-1.32 had set soname as
instead of libboost_date_time.so.1.32
I wonder if I should do the same for 1.33? Does anyone know if the API is
compatible from 1.32 to 1.33? Or, has Redhat made a mistake in doing this?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk