From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-12 22:28:15
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:07:38 -0500, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote
> Jeff Garland writes:
> > Why are digital mars, como and other 'non-required' compilers in the
> > regressions results page ( http://tinyurl.com/cdlxk )?
> Because the release was tested on them and many people would like to
> see what's the status of these?
Shouldn't these be on the 'developer link' ?
> > I was expecting to see an all green condition
> If you follow the "Release View" link at the top, you'll see the
> report showing only the status of the required toolsets.
I see -- I believe this is where the mainpage link should send 'users'.
> > and instead I see a bunch of failures we never really tried to
> > resolve. I think we should remove these from the user pages....
> On what basis?
It's just extra noise for most users -- not many people use dmc or tru64. And
it could reduce their confidence in boost...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk