From: George M. Garner Jr. (gmgarner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-16 13:11:01
Would you mind including this regex fix:
bool BOOST_REGEX_CALL empty()const
--return (m_pimpl.get() ? 0 != m_pimpl->status() : 0);
++return (m_pimpl.get() ? 0 != m_pimpl->status() : 1);
empty() currently returns false (0) when the result of get() is NULL.
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> a écrit dans le message de news:
>I notice that there are already a few patches that have gone into the
> RC_1_33_0 branch, presumably in expectation of a 1.33.1 release?
> So some questions:
> 1) Is the release branch now officially open again for patches: I assume
> that it is now that the release is out.
> 2) Is there any interest in either a hotfix patch-release or possibly a
> 1.33.1 in 4 to 6 weeks time?
> If yes, then I believe we really need to start a readme file with a list
> patches made - this would become the readme for the patch when it's
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk