From: Martin Wille (mw8329_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-17 06:39:14
Thorsten Schuett wrote:
> future<int> f3 = f1 || f2;
We'll probably need more than operator ||.
E.g. consider f1 and f2 implement operations that consume time and may
future<whatever> x = query_google_and_check_links_returned ||
The local archive is faster than searching something over the internet,
but the search may fail. Having an or-operation that waits for the first
function to return a *success* would be useful.
In another reply, thread-cancellation was mentioned. We don't have
thread-cancellation currently, but it would be nice if future<> would
not only accept functors but also allow for an optional interface to be
passed for signaling an abort request. A user would then be able to
implement a mechanism that works form her/him. Maybe, an abort policy
would be the right thing here.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk