Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-17 10:40:21

From: David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
> "Paul Mensonides" <pmenso57_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > The problem here is that there is no way for argument
> > deduction to succeed with an anonymous type because an anonymous type cannot be
> > bound to a template argument--meaning that argument deduction must fail before
> > it even tries.
> Maybe I am misunderstanding what Paul is saying here, but it seems to
> me if it argument deduction was currently supposed to fail when passed
> a type without linkage,
> wouldn't exist.

Doesn't the issue suggest that what is currently supposed to
happen is vague, so one can only determine empirically what a
given compiler will do?

Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer           
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at