From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-17 14:36:38
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Rob Stewart
> > Exactly my point. AFAICT, there is no particular response
> > by the standard in this case.
> I understand now. Paul was saying argument deduction must
> fail and you were saying that it isn't clear that failed
> deduction is the mandated behavior.
It definitely isn't clearly mandated behavior. My argument is only based on
implication from other things that are required and intent when applied to
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk