From: Jonathan Wakely (cow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-23 11:09:53
Nigel Stewart wrote:
> > Both warnings a pretty harmless hence the usual recommendation to
> > disable the warning, I guess.
> > However, the warnings can be removed by exporting only members which
> > truly need to be exported - I was just curious as to why it isn't done
> > in boost (possibly GCC issues?).
> I would be a bit reluctant about "pollution"
> of the boost header files, for the sake of
> a non-standard compiler feature/bug.
Have you seen the boost header files?! :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk