From: Slawomir Lisznianski (slisznianski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-24 20:07:45
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:12:12 +0200, "Ariel Badichi"
> A good solution is to provide a customization point: call a handler that
> can be replaced by the user.
The language already provides this customization through set_unexpected
Althought no standard mandates it, it is commonly expected that each
thread can set its own terminate() or unexpected() function -- calling
set_terminate() or set_unexpected() in one thread affects only the
exceptions in that thread.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk