Re: [boost] serializationsupportforstd::complexandboost::ublas::vector

From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-27 10:40:32

Oh no - what you have is just perfect - assuming that resize creates new 
entries and doesn't just increase some internal indicator.  A copy would 
create the problem of loading to a temporary object that is then copied from 
which would invalidate its address.

Neal Becker wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I wonder about this - but I know nothing of ublas.  If v.resize
>> actually creates the entries I guess it would be just fine.  Now I
>> wonder about my own implementation of serialization for std::vector.
>> It seems yours here is more efficient.
>>
>
> I wondered whether I should use std::copy instead - maybe this would
> provide more opportunity for optimization?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost