|
Boost : |
From: Matt Gruenke (mgruenke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-28 00:11:20
Coincidentally, I just filed an RFE on this very topic (something I'd
been meaning to do for a while, but forgot about until I upgraded to
1.33.0). It was suggested to me that I mention it here. Actually, I'd
have posted here, in the first place, but it seems I misunderstood the
prerequisites for joining this list (I thought it was for code
contributors, only).
From the archive, I can see this thread has covered most, if not all,
of my points. Still, my RFE is probably more cohesive than any single
message, on this topic, I've come across in the archives:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1274707&group_id=7586&atid=357586
BTW, I really don't understand this continual talk of a
user-supplied/overridable handler function. It still compromises
debugging, and without managing to provide anything the user can't
already do in the user-supplied threadfunc. (I'm only mentioning this
because it's a proposal not addressed in my RFE.)
Thanks for considering my views.
Matt Gruenke
Software Engineer
IntelliVid Corp.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk