From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-01 09:56:00
Caleb Epstein wrote:
> On 9/1/05, Jeff Garland <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Finally, I'm not sure we addressed all the concerns with subversion. As I
>>recall there was discussion about large increases in the diskspace
>>etc. Personally I think it's the way to go, but I'd think we need to get
>>broader agreement first.
> Just a data point in the disk-space argument. I've done some conversions of
> decent-sized CVS repositories and the Subversion repository did not use that
> much more disk space than CVS did. It ended up being about 1:1 SVN:CVS ratio
> in terms of disk space usage, maybe slightly higher but not a lot.
I believe the issue that is being talked about here is the required space
for the checked-out tree, not the repository, as subversion keeps a copy of the
original files in the source tree to enable more operations being performed
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk