From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-02 04:21:16
> Wouldn't it be a viable alternative to leave out the swallowed
> exceptions just
> in debug build?
> At least the original posters intent (as I understand it) was to get
> useful information
> propagated to the debugger.
> As a pragmatic approach we just could try to run a regression cycle with
> catch-all removed and measure how many modules are failing because of
> this. If the outcome shows no big difference the catch-all could be simply
> What do you think? Is this feasible?
Personally I'm very uncomfortable in changing the semantics of the lib based
on whether it's a debug build or not.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk