From: Joel Eidsath (jeidsath_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-06 09:39:56
>| My main dissatisfaction is that ZZ and RR don't quite fit as drop-in
>| replacements for int and double.
>Is this a reasonable ambition?
>Aren't the fact that they are not builtin POD types always a problem?
Yes. But NTL could do with a few more overloads for operator= and
operator+ and so on. Not a big deal by any means. The larger issue is
the GPL license. If Stroup would be willing to release under a
different license, like you suggest, that would be great. (As long as
he didn't use any GMP code in building NTL. I think it's from scratch,
but I don't know.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk