Re: [boost] call_once on win32

From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-07 16:25:16

Anthony Williams wrote:
[...]
> Destruction of once_flags with static storage duration.
> 
> If we store the return value along with the once_flag, then we really ought to
> destroy it properly, when the once_flag is destroyed. If a once_flag has
> static storage duration, and has a non-trivial destructor that does cleanup,
> then we have a classic singleton cleanup problem, as John Maddock pointed out
> --- the order of static destruction can now be important.

You mean an extra non-POD version? That's not your problem... as long 
as you provide a POD version + call_once_reset/destroy().

regards,
alexander.