From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-08 18:49:48
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Well it wasn't obvious to me. Its still not. It just compiled on my comeau
>> 4.3 without error.
>> I always thought that compiler was conforming. Oh well.
> On Windows? That's normally in "microsoft bug emulation mode." Try
> http://www.comeaucomputing.com/tryitout (I did!)
> I hate having to go crawling through the standard just to find this
> stuff, but for you, because I like you, kid, I make a special
> 14.6.4 Dependent name resolution [temp.dep.res]
> In resolving dependent names, names from the following sources are
> â Declarations that are visible at the point of definition of the
> â Declarations from namespaces associated with the types of the
> function arguments both from the instantiation context
> (184.108.40.206) and from the definition context.
> Unless one of the arguments has boost::serialization as an associated
> namespace, only the first bullet point applies in this case. It means
> that any overloads provided by the user after the call_serialize
> function definition has been seen will not be considered for overload
Have I still failed to make my point? Did you not get this message?
How hard are you going to make me work for this one?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk