Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-08 18:49:48

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> Well it wasn't obvious to me. Its still not. It just compiled on my comeau
>> 4.3 without error.
>> I always thought that compiler was conforming. Oh well.
> On Windows? That's normally in "microsoft bug emulation mode." Try
> (I did!)
> I hate having to go crawling through the standard just to find this
> stuff, but for you, because I like you, kid, I make a special
> exception:
> 14.6.4 Dependent name resolution [temp.dep.res]
> In resolving dependent names, names from the following sources are
> considered:
> — Declarations that are visible at the point of definition of the
> template.
> — Declarations from namespaces associated with the types of the
> function arguments both from the instantiation context
> ( and from the definition context.
> Unless one of the arguments has boost::serialization as an associated
> namespace, only the first bullet point applies in this case. It means
> that any overloads provided by the user after the call_serialize
> function definition has been seen will not be considered for overload
> resolution.

Have I still failed to make my point? Did you not get this message?
How hard are you going to make me work for this one?

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at