Re: [boost] temp file

From: Dylan Trotter (trotterdylan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-09 16:02:36

Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Dylan Trotter wrote:
> 
>>I think the most important case involves a completely opaque temp file. 
>>You can perform stream operations on it and share it within a process 
>>but have no access to the filesystem specific information (i.e. its 
>>filename).
>>
>>Agree or disagree?
> 
> 
> I'm not sure about the ordering according to importance. It doesn't
> matter which is more important, as long as they are all supported
> (where 'all' is may be three or four different scenarios).

Fair enough. However, I didn't intend to suggest that other scenarios be 
ignored, only that the indicated scenario is a common one around which 
an implementation might be planned. In any case I'm more interested in 
hearing other use cases.

So to rephrase: Other suggestions?

> 
> Regards,
> 		Stefan
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>