From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-13 12:57:59
David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
> Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto <at> cs.aau.dk> writes:
> > If we fix ADL for C++0x,
> ADL is going to get "fixed" by concept support, and not by Herb's
> idea, FWIW. Just my opinion, but well-founded and I have no time to
> go into details now (sorry). So if you think the shape of C++0x
> should be a factor in this discussion, you should be thinking about
> how all this relates to the concepts proposals.
All I can gather from the concept proposals on this issue is that
ADL will *not* happen at all for the new non-dependent parameters.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk