Boost logo

Boost :

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-14 09:34:01

As can be seen at there is a failure for a very
specific test of the hash function on Tru64/cxx65-042.

I finally took the time to track this down and it turned out to be due to a
bogus return value of std::numeric_limits<long double>::denorm_min().

The good news is that it's fixed in the latest compiler release. But should
the failure be marked as expected for older versions of the compiler, or
should a workaround be added to the test itself? Any preferences?


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at