Re: [boost] [thread] condition suffering from lost wakup bug?

From: Matt Hurd (matt.hurd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-14 18:47:03

> On 15/09/05, Roland Schwarz <roland.schwarz_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> 1) Is this corect code with respect to condition variable
>     semantics (posix thread semantics?)

Haven't had a chance to scan through your code yet, just thought I'd
run it and let you know first.

 
> 2) If 1) appplies: Can someone reproduce this on another
>     platform too?

linux posix deadlocks waiting too (gcc 4.01, suse 9.3 x86_64, boost 1.33)

matt.