Re: [boost] [Review] xpressive

From: Scott Woods (scottw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-14 20:43:04

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel de Guzman" <joel_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] xpressive

[snip]

> > something useful and concise was there no flirtation with "key words"
> > (i.e. in the manner of "as_xpr"). "+" could have been "one_or_more(
xpr )".
>
> Again, we've had this discussion before. You might want to look
> at the archives when Spirit was being reviewed. I'm glad Eric chose

Cool. Was searching after your last post. Also looking for explicit
statements in the xpressive docs about conformance (e.g. with Spirit,
Perl, ECMAScript,...). I remember reading them. But not what they
said :-)

All good.