Re: [boost] [config][1.33.1] MinGW improvements?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-15 05:16:48

> I wish :-) I stayed away from using them as those are only defined
> _after_ including an stdlib header. I.e. they aren't defined by the
> compiler but the runtime files. But if you think it's safe to assume
> that the runtime info is defined I'll use them. And I would guess
> similar changes should be made in other places?

Well by the time we get to the platform config headers at least one std lib 
header should have been included, but including <cstddef> would be enough to 
ensure that these get defined if think we should be doubly sure :-)

John.