|
|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-17 19:57:50
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I haven't run the tests with cygwin: in the past I've found cygwin
> to be a pretty poor platform for testing code performance, I don't
> think the cygwin guys have put much effort into runtime efficiency,
> as compared to Linux say.
The Windows EH model hurts. That aside, GCC-4.0.0 is *much* faster
than GCC-3.4.x
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk