|
Boost : |
From: Hugh Hoover (hugh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-18 00:02:56
I have a pair of grammars where one is currently used purely as if it
were a single rule in the second grammar.
I'm finding that I want to use a second rule in the first grammar for
a start rule when invoked from a particular rule in the second grammar.
sort of like this:
struct grammarA : public grammar<grammarA>
{
...
struct definition<ScannerT> {
...
definition(grammarA const& self)
{
r_ruleOne = ...
r_ruleTwo = ...
...
}
rule<ScannerT, parser_context<>, parser_tag<ruleOneId> >
const & start() const
{
return r_ruleOne;
}
};
};
grammarA r_grammarA;
struct grammarB : public grammar<grammarB>
{
struct definition<ScannerT> {
...
definition(grammarB const& self)
{
r_ruleBOne = ( r_grammarA | chseq_p("foo") );
r_ruleBTwo = ( chseq_p("bar") >> ???
r_grammarA.definition.r_ruleTwo ??? ); // obviously bogus -
// r_ruleBTwo is currently like the above with just
r_grammarA in the second part.
...
}
...
};
};
Is this possible?
grammar_def doesn't appear to apply here - it could work if I wanted
to start the WHOLE parse at a different start node, but referenced
from another grammar?
I can't find any (other) appropriate wordage under "rule" or
"grammar" in the spirit docs.
is my example understandable? I elided a lot of "boilerplate" to
keep it short...
I can't separate grammarA::r_ruleTwo from grammarA, it needs other
rules in grammarA.
I >could< just copy the whole damn grammarA and specify a different
start rule, but that just doesn't seem very elegant, no'wuddimean?
Hugh Hoover
Enumclaw Software
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk