Re: [boost] [config] win32 identification macros

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 11:51:51

Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:

>>> Does anyone know why it's necessary to test __WIN32__ and WIN32? A
>>> quick test
>>> showed that vc6-7.1, cw8-9.4, como 4.3.3, gcc 3.4.2 (minGW), dmc,
>>> bcc
>>> 5.6.4, and
>>> intel 7.1-8.0 all define _WIN32. What's left over?
>>
>> Borland.
>
> Right, I forgot to mention it.

Hmmm .... No I didn't: it's in my original list ;-)

> But I also tested it (5.6.4) and it
> defines _WIN32 too.

> Jonathan