From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 11:51:51
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>>> Does anyone know why it's necessary to test __WIN32__ and WIN32? A
>>> quick test
>>> showed that vc6-7.1, cw8-9.4, como 4.3.3, gcc 3.4.2 (minGW), dmc,
>>> 5.6.4, and
>>> intel 7.1-8.0 all define _WIN32. What's left over?
> Right, I forgot to mention it.
Hmmm .... No I didn't: it's in my original list ;-)
> But I also tested it (5.6.4) and it
> defines _WIN32 too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk