Boost logo

Boost :

From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-26 02:56:22

Jason Hise <chaos_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Because the singleton library is now being designed to work with shared
> memory in addition to allowing multiple instances in a singleton_map
> (multiton), I have a particularly difficult situation to deal with. The
> main problem is: when a multiton exists in shared memory, who should own
> the timeout threads associated with each instance?

How about each process that accesses the singleton having a thread that checks
the timeout?


Anthony Williams
Software Developer
Just Software Solutions Ltd

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at