Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-28 09:20:46

Next message: Martin Wille: "Re: [boost] [boostbook] BOOST_ROOT vs BOOST_BUILD_PATH"
Previous message: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [boost] 'noncopyable' : base class undefined"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "[boost] Are we seriously planning to release 1.33.1 in a few days?"

On 9/27/05, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:

Can we get rid of those in time? Is it working to alert developers to
> regressions in their libraries?

Should the testers be running RC_1_33_0 or HEAD? I've been running HEAD
since the 1.33 release...

--
Caleb Epstein
caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com

Next message: Martin Wille: "Re: [boost] [boostbook] BOOST_ROOT vs BOOST_BUILD_PATH"
Previous message: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [boost] 'noncopyable' : base class undefined"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "[boost] Are we seriously planning to release 1.33.1 in a few days?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk