From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-28 10:22:07
On 09/28/2005 09:33 AM, Rob Stewart wrote:
> I'm confused. I thought the whole point of your library was to
> create an object that *has* a value and to constrain that value
> to be a member of a prescribed set. That's how you can add them
> together, increment them, etc. Thus, "constrained_value" is
> exactly the right name.
This sounds *almost* like the range_all mentioned in:
The difference, AFAICT, as that each element is the "prescribed set"
is an enumeration instead of some contiguous subset of an integral
value like int or long.
Maybe the common parts could be factored out? I could re-upload the
range_all.zip to the vault if you're interested.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk