Boost logo

Boost :

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-29 07:36:00

On 9/26/05 6:16 AM, "Robert Kawulak" <kawulak_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> The reason I was thinking so was "Exceptional C++" item 20 p.9 which says
> that postincrement operator should return a const value, from this I deduced
> that conversion operator should also. But as I mentioned, I didn't think of
> it a lot so I may be wrong ;-).

Actually, under my opinion/theory, NO function, member function, or operator
returns a const non-reference. That's includes the post-increment operator.
However, I don't have the "Exceptional C++" book, so I don't know the
author's reasoning for his opinion.

Daryle Walker
Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
darylew AT hotmail DOT com

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at