Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Simon Buchan (simon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-29 23:00:42

Next message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [serialization] A question about the implementation ofXML_name in basic_xml_oarchive.ipp"
Previous message: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: [boost] Reason for C++'s Success (was: Reason for Java'sSuccess)"
In reply to: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: [boost] Reason for C++'s Success (was: Reason for Java'sSuccess)"
Next in thread: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: [boost] Reason for C++'s Success (was: Reason for Java's Success)"

Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> "Jeff Garland" <jeff_at_[hidden]> wrote
>
>>Friendly moderation reminder...
>>
>>This list is for discussing Boost libraries -- not C++ versus JAVA. So
>>let's either bring this back on topic or move it elsewhere.
>
> Yes, sorry.

Same here! (but it was more my fault)

Next message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [serialization] A question about the implementation ofXML_name in basic_xml_oarchive.ipp"
Previous message: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: [boost] Reason for C++'s Success (was: Reason for Java'sSuccess)"
In reply to: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: [boost] Reason for C++'s Success (was: Reason for Java'sSuccess)"
Next in thread: Arkadiy Vertleyb: "Re: [boost] Reason for C++'s Success (was: Reason for Java's Success)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk