From: Asger Mangaard (tmb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-04 15:15:16
> Gennadiy wrote:
>> if we do get a PBSP sometime soon, it still needs policies to
>> provide the desired behavior. Then, you need some way of
>> packaging it nicely for this purpose. Otherwise, you create an
>> uglier wart that's harder to use. IOW, even with a PBSP, you'd
>> probably want at least a header with the policies and some
>> wrapper class or typedefs to make it easier to use.
> Yes. Policy implementation and convenience typedef is my choice for the
> solution IMO.
I'll gladly implement this policy if/when we get a policy_ptr. Until then,
I definately think the pimpl library is the way to go.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk