From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-04 16:56:43
From: "Gennadiy Rozental" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]>
> > I'll gladly implement this policy if/when we get a policy_ptr. Until then,
> > I definately think the pimpl library is the way to go.
> Way to go where? I don't see it as another variation of smatr_ptr within
> boost. As your own library - of course.
If one is looking for a pimpl library one won't look at the
smart_ptr library until and unless one recognizes that it is a
type of smart pointer. Thus, a separate library, even if
implemented using the smart_ptr library, would be helpful.
-- Rob Stewart stewart_at_[hidden] Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk