From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-07 10:17:07
> Uh, where is it?
It was posted to the boost-users list. Implementation is utterly trivial
> There are a number of useful things to go with complex. Here is
> It is common to need the scalar type that corresponds to a numeric
> type, whether that type is complex or scalar. For example, the type
> returned by abs. Implementation is pretty trivial:
Interesting, and good point.
OK, is there any objection to is_complex being added, what about Neal's
trait (and what to call it if it is added, "scalar" maybe?).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk