From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-09 06:45:31
Alexander Nasonov wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>> What I should do, is add some documentation about using Boost.Hash
>> with class inheritance. I'll try to do that soon-ish.
>> What do you think about having a macro to disable the extensions?
> It would be nice addition to Boost.Hash.
>> Am I right in thinking that your main concern is that the extensions
>> are in Boost.TR1?
I'd like to add that having the extensions in the Boost implementation of
TR1 is a good way to uncover potential problems with them, in preparation
for their official submission for TR1.5 or TR2. My preference would be to
leave them in.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk