From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-10 09:36:01
Not only I wasn't there at the mettings but from Thuesday night I was
undergoing an emergency gall bladder surgery so I coulnd't even respond the
But I'm back home now... still recovering but I can sit in front of the
> numeric_cast<> : Interested? Yes 10, No 0
> Optional : Interested? Strong yes 9, weak yes 2, weak no 3, strong
> no 0 Significant concerns about the interface:
> Pointer interface.
It figues. FWIW, I'll stand strong on this part of the interface... though
I'm not sure how much my position can affect the final TR2 form.
> Two ways of doing the same thing.
Hmm, really? Did they gave examples?
> Depends on nullptr - is there a backup plan.
I could have proposed 'none' along Optional, in its own context, but that
would duplicate much of nullptr... I didn't see the need for such
> Dubious of use of references.
Does this mean they don't see that as useful or that is not well supported?
General question: what shall I do from now on? Follow the discussions on
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk