From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-11 12:55:02
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Joel de Guzman writes:
>> Ah, yes, and I will forever be against the pointer interface.
>> Zen of Python:
>> There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
> I can quote the whole thing any time of the day, but it hardly
> justifies the existence of 'get', let alone its "obviousness" ;).
Ya, hmm, well, get() (and get_pointer()) there in the proposal is a mistake
(or else the pointer interface is.. clearly both shouldn't coexist)
FWIW, I wrote the 2 proposals in a high rush over one weekend 'cause I had
no idea there was a dateline until Thorstten told me about it, just a few
There were a couple of loose ends in both of them... as you can see.
-- Fernando Cacciola SciSoft http://fcacciola.50webs.com/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk