From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-13 11:40:30
Daryle Walker <darylew_at_[hidden]> writes:
> [Yes, I'm way behind on my reading.]
> On 9/30/05 1:36 PM, "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> "David Abrahams" wrote
>>>> * There are some dependencies among libraries, but they are not
>>>> tightly coupled.
>>> Then why do you need to download the whole collection?
>> Because that's the way it is.
>>>> * There is a tool (bcp) for extracting the parts you want and their
>>> Then why is it not available at the website? You still have to download the
>>> complete libraries.
>> Because that's the way it is. Are these questions relevant to what
>> should go in the What is Boost section, or are you just asking me?
> "That's the way it is" is a useless tautological response. Maybe a full
> explanation would help Andy more.
I sure don't think Andy was looking for help; his post seemed to be a
critique of my suggested web content. Those questions seemed to
challenge the validity of the bullet points I was suggesting. I was
trying to document the status quo, and "that's the way it is" was the
best way I could find to express it.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk