From: Russell Hind (rh_gmane_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-14 04:39:17
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> What other operator would you suggest?
> - "<<" is not good because the library can not just save,
> but also load data
> - ">>" is not good for the same reason
> - Writing
> is very inconvenient.
I agree. It may not be the most obvious but it allows a single
serialize function rather than explicit save/load functions or chained
calls as you've shown above.
If someone thinks a different operator is more suitable then fine, but I
like the single operator that is present at the moment.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk